Search:


Location: News > United States > Oregon
Bill to require fluoride in water passes House
 
  Latest News from Oregon

  • Survey finds tooth decay on the rise among Oregon schoolchildren
  • A capsule look at what Oregon Legislature did
  • State fluoride legislation goes down the drain
  • Effort to fluoridate more water in Oregon ends for this session
  • The fate of a state bill mandating fluoridation of many water supplies will be decided during a vote this week


  • Read more news from Oregon
      
    Salem Statesman Journal
    March 22, 2005

    Bill to require fluoride in water passes House
    Cities that cannot afford it won't have to comply with rule

    BY NIKI SULLIVAN
    The Associated Press

    The Oregon House on Monday passed a bill requiring cities with more than 10,000 people to add fluoride to their drinking water, but it allows them a way out if they don't have the money. The bill passed by a 36-22 vote.

    About 20 percent of Oregonians drink fluoridated water. Salem is one of the cities where fluoridation is required by local ordinances. Keizer also adds fluoride to its water.

    The bill passed by the House would apply to Portland, Medford, Bend and other cities that do not fluoridate their water and have resisted efforts in the past to require it.

    Under an amendment to the legislation, however, if cities don't have the money to pay for adding fluoride to their water supplies, they wouldn't have to raise rates or taxes to do so -- which essentially would make those cities exempt from the law.

    The amendment was added when it became clear that no state funds would be available to help cities with the cost.

    Lawmakers for decades have argued about requiring statewide fluoridation. Every surgeon general since the 1950s has endorsed it.

    Dentists say that adding fluoride to water is a cost-effective way to cut back on tooth decay.

    Rep. Billy Dalto, R-Salem, said that costs to fluoridate water can range from less than $1 to more than $5 per person per year, far less than the cost of treating preventable cavities.

    "The more than 400,000 children with tooth decay in Oregon cannot afford the status quo," Dalto said.

    Critics argue that there are health risks from exposure to the chemical, which is considered a toxic substance in high enough quantities.

     
     
    Fluoride Action Network | 802-355-0999 | info@fluoridealert.org